Tuesday, November 4, 2008

OBAMA WINS PRESIDENCY!

Well America, we did it.

Barack Obama wins the presidency

I posted this before: Barack Obama Wins Presidency And hoped it would come true... and it has.

Obama Wins Presidency

The world will never look at America the same. Hopefully, this will take our country in a better direction. Other countries will see us different now. And we proved we can look past skin color and elect a president.

Say it, get used to it: President Barack Obama.

Congrats to the winners

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Back From Voting

I just walked in from standing in line almost two hours to cast my vote on Election Day!

Here is a picture I snapped just a few moments after arriving.

Election Day Photo

The line went straight ahead and then curved around the school building. The line went from the voting machines, all the way to the street. People near us said they had been there earlier and the line was much longer, but went home and came back.

As I mentioned, the wait was over an hour and a half, but not quite two hours. From leaving the house and getting back home was close to two hours, as the drive was not that far.

And yes, I voted for Barack Obama.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, November 3, 2008

Palin Hurting McCain

Is Sarah Palin going to cost John Mccain the election?
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A new national poll suggests Sarah Palin may be hurting Republican presidential nominee John McCain more than she's helping him.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Sunday indicates McCain's running mate is growing less popular among voters and may be costing him a few crucial percentage points in the race for the White House.

Fifty-seven percent of likely voters questioned in the poll said Palin does not have the personal qualities a president should have. That's up 8 points since September.

Fifty-three percent say she does not agree with them on important issues. That's also higher than September.

"Just after the GOP convention in early September, 53 percent said they would vote for Palin over Joe Biden if there were a separate vote for vice president. Now, Biden would beat Palin by 12 points if the running mates were chosen in a separate vote," said CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

Despite the SNL imitations and appearances, sometimes America needs more than just a foksy soccer mom to run the United States of America.

The Republicans should have thought more about the running mate in the 2008 election.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Waterboard Barack Obama

As I sit here, reading the news, awaiting the final Presidential Debate, I felt the need to prove Sean Hannity wrong.
"Nobody in the Republican Party has resorted to overtones of "race and fear" in attacking Obama."

Not only has it been shown that high ranking Republican leaders are training vote recruiters in talking points, to smear Obama claiming he has ties to Osama Bin Laden, we can prove Sean Hannity wrong by simple showing a graphic used by the Republican Party in California, on their official website.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is how the Republicans plan on gaining votes... "Waterboard Barack Obama" ads.

Waterboard Obama

This was used on the official Republican website, although since removed, it shows how far this political party is willing to go to try and make Barack Obama look bad by claiming he has ties to Osama Bin Laden, totally false.

Here is what FoxNews had to say about it...

A California county's Republican Party Web site encouraged readers to "Waterboard Barack Obama" and compared Obama to Usama bin Laden, drawing criticism on Wednesday from Democrats and Republicans in the state.

The Web site of the Sacramento County Republican Party posted five illustrations saying that the terrorist group Hamas supported Obama and that "the only difference between Obama and Osama is BS." Another attacked Michelle Obama, reading, "Hey Obama! Want to see bitter?"

The graphics were removed from the site by Wednesday, after the state GOP urged the local group to take them down.

The state Republican Party learned of the controversial content when it received a phone call from a reporter, said party spokesman Hector Barajas.

"I called the Sacramento county chairman and I had them remove it," Barajas said. "I also noted to them that this is a complete distraction from what we're trying to do, and that's elect John Mccain and Sarah Palin as the next president and vice president of the United States."

I also posted about the GOP leaders in Virginia, equating Obama with Osama, and training vote recruiters to use the talking point that Obama and Osama are friends.

Anyhow, back to the topic of proving Sean Hannity wrong for his comment that no one in the Republican party has resorted to fear or race in this campaign. As you can see that is plainly, not the case.

Official Republican leaders have used racist graphics, as well as, images that promote fear. Not to mention, not only does the "Waterboard Obama" ad insinuate he is connected to Osama Bin Laden, the ad encourages torture against a United States Senator. Before John McCain switched his stance on waterboarding, he was against it. He said it amounted to torture, and American military had no place in torturing people. He has since, flip flopped, changed his policy and believes in torture as a means to gather info. The old McCain would have shunned this type of advertisement, and it shows the length to which these politicians will go to gain a vote during an election.

Even though the "Waterboard Obama" ad has been removed, it still proves that Sean Hannity did a little more than stretch the truth by claiming no one in the Republican party had stooped this low. They have. Here's the proof, Seany Boy.

I would also like to take this time to prove yet another point I have tried to make before. Notice how these racist things happening on the campaign trail, are actually not in the South? Notice how people say "oh the South is so racist." As I look at the electoral maps today, I see Obama is making gains in Southern states, while not suffering the hateful rhetoric he is getting from other states!

The latest hate is in California, not the South! Imagine that...

Seattle Times reports...
The Sacramento Bee asked Craig MacGlashan about the content after seeking his reaction to hate-filled graffiti that was spray-painted over an Obama display on a fence in Sacramento.

In recent weeks, MacGlashan, an attorney, joined local Democratic party officials in condemning vandalism to political displays.

The vandalism to the Obama display appeared to have been done overnight Monday. A racial epithet, profanity, "KKK" and the words "white power" were clearly visible from the roadway. Six of the nine fence panels were defaced.

"What you are describing to me is not free speech, it's vandalism. We don't condone it," MacGlashan said.

Those people spraying "KKK" on signs, and "white power" are nowhere near the South. As a matter of fact, due to population, there are more registered hate groups in California than the southern states combined, believe it. California has more registered race hating groups, than if you combined all the hate groups in the south. And as the news reports, you can see where all the hate is taking place. Not in the South.

Using fear like this in an election campaign in the year 2008, amounts to terrorism in my opinion. Our political climate should be free of these types of advertisements coming directly from the Republican Party. Sure, some wackos will always make racist ads or propaganda, but to have it being shown on Republican party web sites takes it to a whole new level.

You are wrong Sean, your party has in fact, stooped that low.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

President Obama

Get used to hearing it, get used to saying it. "President Obama"

Barack Obama will be the next President of the United States.

When I first started watching the political race for the presidency, to be honest, I'm not that big on Hillary Clinton. So I wasn't that excited or involved in the race. Then Barack Obama won the nomination... and while I do not want any more Republicans running the country, I'd rather place my vote for someone I believe in and not just to vote against John McCain. What do I mean? Let me elaborate for a moment...

When George Bush was running against John Kerry, I voted Kerry. Not because I liked him. In fact, I didn't. Still don't. But I voted for him anyway. I didn't vote for him, I voted against Bush. This time around, it will be different.

Instead of placing my vote, just so one party doesn't win, I will be voting for someone whom I at least believe is the best choice at this time. I can't stand watching Bush give an interview or a speech, on the other hand, when Barack Obama speaks, he draws me in and I want to hear more of what he has to say.

I want to place my vote for someone I believe in, someone who I feel will help lead this country. I don't want my country to be in such bad shape politically that the only person I can vote for President, is the guy with the less amount of scandal attached to him, or to cast my vote because I don't want the other guy to win. I like Barack Obama, although we obviously differ in some policy ideas, out of the two he is the best for the nation.

I'm not necessarily an "undecided," but I don't consider myself a Democrat, or a Republican, that's for sure. My views put me under the Libertarian umbrella when focused on the issues, but in this election, all I can do is choose between these two. John McCain or Barack Obama? I'm not sure why people feel the need to be Left or Right, this country needs more people in the middle, Centrists, whatever you call em today. Moderates?

Unlike many, I refuse to let religious matters get in my during an election, I do not "practice" any faith, and I exercise my right to remain, godless. I feel too many let religion cloud their judgment, and do more harm in politics than good. But enough on that, back to President Obama.

What other reasons would I vote for Obama?

I'm also tired of the war. Barack Obama says he wants to end it, come up with timeline for withdrawal, and execute the plan. John McCain has been quoted as saying, we will be in Iraq "for at least 100 years." 100 years? No. The American people need to stop these war mongers now. Obama voted against the war when it was started, and John McCain continues to support eh Bush policy of "keep sending troops to Iraq." It's time to stop.

I have, for years now, more than one family member serving in Iraq. Multiple tours of duty, and when you hear them ask questions like "why are we even over there?" It's hard to answer. There is no reason, we need to get out of Iraq.

I also think, Barack Obama will be the one to really help put all the past segregation and inequality questions to rest, finally. If America elects a racially mixed man for President, I really feel not only will America begin to look at itself differently, I feel the world will view us in a new light. Racism and inequality have plagued this country long enough, hopefully, under new leadership, Obama can help bring us together and lead our people into a new era of Freedom in this country. Sure there will still be racists, that's not my point, I am referring to those who are ready to move this land forward, and put their own issues to rest. The past is the past, it is time to go forward. When people born to an interracial family, single mother, can make it to the Oval Office, anything is possible folks. Anything.

ABC News' George Stephanopoulos reports: Going into tonight's third and final presidential debate Barack Obama leads John McCain 53 to 39 percent in support nationally, according to the latest CBS News/New York Times poll.

Among independent voters -- a crucial voting group in this election -- Obama now leads McCain by 18 points, according to the CBS/Times poll.


Go Obama!

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Final Presidential Debate

Tomorrow is the big day, and for many Americans, this has been a much anticipated moment.

The Final Presidential Debate of 2008 is upon us. And remarks, made this week, by John McCain may indicate this could be the most exciting of the debates of this election. McCain has vowed to "whip Barack's you-know-what." How Presidential.

Final Presidential Debate

The final presidential debate airs at 9 pm EST, 6 PST. The run time is about 90 minutes, and will be aired on every major network. CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX and CNN etc...

According to Associated Press, and as I've mentioned previously by barack showing leadership on foreclosures, the two candidates will both try and show themselves as a leader in the debate.

Barack Obama and John McCain will both pursue the image of a strong leader in troublesome economic times as they meet Wednesday night for their third and final presidential debate.


Joe Biden says he will be disappointed if John McCain brings up William Ayers.

"In my view, the ads that are being run picturing Barack Obama and people saying 'known terrorist' -- I think that's over the top."

As he continued his two-day bus tour across the Buckeye State stopping at Lisbon's Steel Trolley Diner for lunch, Biden said "Barack Obama was eight years old when this guy Ayers was doing bad things."

Biden said he felt "good" about tomorrow's debate, expressing "total confidence" in Obama.

Biden warned that he would be "disappointed" to see McCain bring up Ayers in Wednesday's third and final debate, though McCain has threatened to do so in response to Obama's suggestion that the Republican candidate doesn't have the guts to raise the issue to his face.

All Obama has to do, Biden says, is "repeat the performance he's had the last two times out."

Biden said the debates have contrasted "a guy who’s confident and steady and a guy who's not quite sure of where he wants to take the country."

Accusations of voter fraud in battleground states are beginning to make the nightly news, and we just await election day. I plan on voting early, and so should you! And make sure you tune in for the final debate of the presidential election 2008.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, October 13, 2008

Karl Rove: Obama Has The Electoral

Despite the excitement over Americans casting their vote for who they feel is the best President is the United States, the electoral vote is what actually elects the President. So how is Barack Obama doing in the electoral college?

Well, even according to Karl Rove, Barack Obama has the electoral votes to win! All you need is 270.

Republican strategist Karl Rove said over the weekend Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) has clearly pulled ahead of Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). But Rove also cautioned that the race could still drastically change, just as it has in the last two weeks when news of McCain's suspending his campaign, Congress' financial bailout package and the first presidential debate affected voters' perceptions.

Rove said on Sunday on his website that Obama had reached more than the 270 required electoral votes to win an election. Citing 39 new state polls in the first three days of October, Rove said the freshman Democrat now has 273 electoral votes while McCain has 163 and 102 votes remain in a toss-up.

Electoral College

LA Times has Obama at 277 electoral votes.
National electoral map: McCain gains Indiana while Obama holds 277

Nearly two dozen new state polls in recent days show the Democratic Party ticket headed by Sen. Barack Obama holding strong with 277 hypothetical electoral votes, 7 more than needed for election, but Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin have regained traditionally Republican Indiana from the tossup category.

This according to the latest state-by-state poll research compiled by Karl Rove & Co. and published in The Ticket by permission every few days.

With Indiana's 11 electoral votes, the first time since early September that the Republican ticket has gained, McCain-Palin now hold 174 electoral votes while another 87 remain in the tossup category.

Barack Obama is outspending McCain, who is running 100% negative ads right now, that many feel is not helping his campaign.
Couple those factors with a massive spending edge for Obama on television, and it's not hard to understand why the Illinois senator sits above 300 electoral votes for the second week of Fix picks in a row.

And, even this map may undersell Obama's strength somewhat as his heavy advertising in places like Florida, North Carolina and Indiana -- 53 total electoral votes -- have turned all three states into true tossups. If Obama were to sweep those three states, he would stand at 364 electoral votes -- the most since Bill Clinton won re-election over former Kansas Sen. Bob Dole with 379 electoral votes in 1996.

While it is important that people get out and vote on Election Day, it is vitally important for Barack Obama to gain the "electoral vote."

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Joe Biden Speech

Just finished watching the live Joe Biden Change We Need speech from the Barack Obama site. The internet rocks for politics.

Joe Biden Change We Need Speech

I like being able to watch live events and videos from all over the country, covering the election.

Vice presidential candidate Joe Biden stumped in his northeastern Pennsylvania hometown Sunday alongside New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and former President Bill Clinton. (Oct. 12)




UPDATE: AP added this video so I thought I should include it.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, October 9, 2008

How Can Anyone Still Be Undecided?

Last night was the first time I actually started thinking about people who are "undecided" in regards to the upcoming election. "How can anyone still be undecided?" I thought. And it still has me pondering. So I started to look up some articles about these undecided voters to see if I could understand why they are still debating which side to vote for.

Some undecided voters are leaning toward Obama.
With disgust dripping from his voice, Mr. Sullivan read aloud a story on page 4B of USA Today about how AIG agents had spent $443,000 on a week-long retreat at a California resort six days after the government bailed them out. When he came to the part about Joseph Cassano, the head of AIG’s finance division, taking home $34 million and then being placed on a $1 million-a-month consulting retainer in February, he smacked the paper.

“They should have had these CEOs in handcuffs yesterday,” he said looking at the accompanying photograph of two former AIG CEOs taking an oath before testifying to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. “I would have liked to have heard someone say ‘Bailiff, bring the shackles.’ I want outrage, I want heads to roll.”

Mr. Sullivan does not believe either Sen. Obama or Sen. McCain is forceful enough to lead the country out of its current economic morass but he is increasingly convinced Sen. McCain is too tied to the special interests in Washington to be given a chance try.

I can understand the frustration this guy feels. All Americans should be upset about this type of stuff. McCain even corrected someone during the second presidential debates for calling it a "bailout," he said he calls it a "rescue." A fine example of how McCain is "out of touch" with ordinary Americans. Americans feels the way Mr. Sullivan does, not the way McCain does.
Watching the debate Tuesday night Mr. Sullivan said he was angered by what he saw as Sen. McCain’s vague promises.

“He said ‘I know how to get America working again,’ but he never said how,” Mr. Sullivan said. “Two weeks ago he said our economy was fundamentally strong, well that tells me for a man who is supposed to be in the middle of the action, his head is in the sand.”

When the debate switched topics to foreign policy, Mr. Sullivan’s interest waned.

“Our house is on fire here, I don’t have time to cut my neighbor’s grass,” he said. “We need a strong domestic economy before we can fix the rest of the world.”

Everyday citizens are worried more about gas prices in America, than about foreign policy.
“There is something fundamentally wrong with our system when I go to my local grocery store and the apples there are from China,” Mr. Sullivan said.

“I’m conservative, I don’t want to see the Democrats get into power and spend like drunken sailors, but the pendulum has swung too far to the right. It needs to be brought back.”

I think many, many, many of us feel the same way right now. Some voters say after the debates, neither candidate "delivered" or "got angry enough."

Are you undecided? If so, please tell me why.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, October 3, 2008

Presidential Debate Schedule 2008

There are many people out there who do not know when the Presidential Debates are on.

Presidential Debate Schedule 2008

Each debate begins at 9pm EST, 6 PST. Run time 90 minutes. The debates will be aired on every major network such as CBS, ABC, NBC, and FOX. Of course you can see them on CNN, MSNBC and other cable network news channels.
September 26, 2008: Obama/McCain debate at University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS

October 2, 2008: Palin / Biden Vice Presidential debate at Washington University, St. Louis, MO

October 7, 2008: Presidential debate in town hall format takes place at Belmont University, Nashville, TN - Submit a Question

October 15, 2008: Presidential debate taking place at Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY

Be sure to tune in and see how your candidate feels about certain issues facing America today.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Joe Biden Wins VP Debate

I will keep this entry short and sweet. People on either side will be arguing who won the vice presidential debate over the next week, or at least until the next one. However, there are a few things that give the edge to Biden on "who won."

Biden wins VP debate

Biden did his best to stay on topic and answer the questions he was asked. Quite a few times Sarah Palin did the opposite of that. She dodged a couple questions, but did so smoothly and effectively without drawing much attention to the fact she was sidestepping a question or two during the debate.

Biden also did very well in not coming across as a bully or picking on the experience of Palin. However, he effectively drove home one point that should not be overlooked: to link McCain to the policies of George Bush. A vote for McCain is a vote for the same, and we need change.

At times you can see Palin is so off course and wandering around topics that it is aggravating watching her wink at the camera. The "mom next door" stuff has got to go. We need more in a leader than that. You could also tell her knowledge of topics was actually only skin deep, and once she rattled off her main talking points on topics, she simply repeated the catch phrases and tried to forward the McCain Palin agenda.

Therefore, I have to say Joe Biden won the debate.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Now what? After the VP debate

Now that the smoke has cleared, the excitement and anticipation depleted, now what?

We know Sarah Palin can hold her own in a structured format of debate which doesn't allow for much interaction between candidates for vice president. We know Palin knows how to win a crowd, but what will she and her party do that will differ from the last eight years we've had with George Bush. We also know that the McCain campaign's attempt at smearing Gwen Ifill prior to the debate, was a sad ploy of worried political strategists trying to invoke intimidation into the process. Gwen Ifill did an excellent job at moderating the event, and showed absolutely no bias.

Listen folks, we need change, we need something new. Someone who will lead instead of follow the same game plan that has gotten us eight years of failure. McCain has voted over 90% of the time right along side Bush and all his policies. He supported and has no end in sight for the War in Iraq, and has admitted his own lack of knowledge when it comes to economics. Iraq is costing us $10 Billion dollars per month, while Iraq has over 80 Billion in the bank! Let them pay for their own "liberation." We've lost like 4,000 soldiers as of right now...

Constantly trying to paint herself as "like the rest of Americans" will backfire on Palin. One thing that annoys me is when someone like Sarah Palin tries to claim she is anything that resembles a "hockey mom." Compare the size of her house to yours, calculate how many days of the week her husband actually "works" and isn't riding around town with her in big tax payer owned SUVs burning up $4 a gallon gas. She wouldn't wanna be in the same shoes as the rest of America if her life depended on it.

At this time in our nation's history we do not need the "mom next door" running this country. We need someone who understands foreign policy, the threat of terror, economics, and a wide variety of complex issues that many feel Palin is out of her league in regards to what would be expected of her should the aging John McCain have a heart attack or something. It worries me, that presenting Palin as "the everyday mom" is the Republicans focus. It should worry all Americans. We need and deserve more than that.

Palin can see Russia from her house

Sarah "I can see Russia from my house" Palin is nothing like the rest of America. She is connected to the Big Oil companies that are squeezing out every nickel and dime they can out of the American people. In fact, no other Governor in America is so connected to the oil companies. McCain and Palin plan on reducing taxes for these very companies that are making record profits, meanwhile normal everyday American people can barely afford to put in $30 at the gas pump, let alone fill up.

I promise you, Sarah Palin, does not have to worry about filling up her gas tank. Her gas is most likely continuously paid for by the tax payers in America. She rides around on the taxpayers dime, and is as out of touch with American's as "I can only count up to 7 when it comes to how many houses I own" McCain.

McCain is not like Americans either. This guy flies around on his own corporate jet, he has never ran his own business, he has lived off the tax payer dime since he was born (not in this country.) Yes, McCain was not born in the US, he was born in the Panama Canal Zone which was never considered a part of the United States. Some even question his "natural born citizen" status, having never been born on U.S. soil, he may be a citizen, but not "natural born." McCain was born into a family living off the taxpayer, and lived a privileged life, never really having to stand on his own. Ultimately he was shot down in Vietnam after only 20 hours of combat time, and this one event is what is used most effectively in his campaign.

We all know John McCain served in Vietnam, I have an uncle who fought in 'Nam and spent a lot more time in combat than John McCain did, but what does that mean in regards to running America? McCain has no real plan for America, and is out of touch with those of us who actually have to pay bills and share finance with our wife or husband. McCain is in a prenuptial agreement, and married into his wealth. His name isn't on anything he owns, and both he and his wife owe their entire fortune to her father who is a large distributor of Budweiser.

Listen, we cannot afford another four more years of the same. McCain just wants to sell as much beer as he can, cut taxes for the rich and wealthy, and continue to siphon revenue out of every pocket in America by being "in bed with the oil companies" of his running mate Sarah Palin.

We need a change, and even though I am not a Democrat, I will vote for Barack Obama to help assist that change of direction in this country.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Vice Presidential Debate

What did I think of the vice presidential debate of 2008?

I knew not to underestimate Sarah Palin, it would be foolish to do so and she performed well. She was obviously crammed with the all the proper talking points regarding most topics that could come up during the debate. However, much of the things she said looked very rehearsed and her responses very scripted.

Sarah Palin was obviously well prepared for the topics and would not be where she is if she was not good at witty retorts and making jabs at her opponent as she twists facts and beats around the bush a bit. Biden even pointed out at times she did not answer a question.

Joe Biden did exceptionally well at trying to deliver the Barack Obama message and even had a nice little "almost tear up" moment. He illustrated his knowledge on foreign affairs, his concerns about ending the war in Iraq, health care for Americans, and many other "around the table" topics that face our nation. He even stopped himself at one point from making a negative comment about McCain and instead rephrased and made a positive comment about Obama. I liked seeing him take his thoughts from placing blame to coming up with a solution, and it showed.

Debates of this nature must be extremely anxiety causing, but overall both nominees did a good job at presenting their side of the "argument." Although there was not much debating, just fact trading and policy discussion regarding where their opponent stands and past votes for legislation and bills.

Palin tried to make Obama look as if he did not support the troops, while McCain voted against funding the troops because the bill had a "timeline to bring Iraq troops home."

McCain opposes a timeline to bring the troops home. As someone who has family in Iraq, I wish they would end the war in Iraq and bring our family members home safely.

So who do you think won?

Labels: , , , , , ,

Biden vs Palin Debate

The moment we have all been waiting for! It's finally Thursday, and in just a few hours we will finally get to see the first of the Vice Presidential Debates of 2008.

The Senator Joe Biden vs Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin Debate. (If you can really call it that)

Joe Biden vs Sarah Palin Debate

Although considering the way these type of political television shows go, and according to the New York Times, McCain fought for a strict and structured format for the "debate" which will most likely leave most of us viewers scratching our head wondering "what debate?"
The Obama and McCain campaigns have agreed to an unusual free-flowing format for the three televised presidential debates, which begin Friday, but the McCain camp fought for and won a much more structured approach for the questioning at the vice-presidential debate, advisers to both campaigns said Saturday.

At the insistence of the McCain campaign, the Oct. 2 debate between the Republican nominee for vice president, Gov. Sarah Palin, and her Democratic rival, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., will have shorter question-and-answer segments than those for the presidential nominees, the advisers said. There will also be much less opportunity for free-wheeling, direct exchanges between the running mates.

McCain advisers said they had been concerned that a loose format could leave Ms. Palin, a relatively inexperienced debater, at a disadvantage and largely on the defensive.

What will they come up with next? A "loose format" would allow the nominees to answer questions and provide more reasoning for their stances on issues.

Here's the good part...
The wrangling was chiefly between the McCain-Palin camp and the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, which is sponsoring the forums.

Commission members wanted a relaxed format that included time for unpredictable questioning and challenges between the two vice-presidential candidates. On Wednesday, the commission unanimously rejected a proposal sought by advisers to Ms. Palin and Senator John McCain of Arizona, the Republican presidential nominee, to have the moderator ask questions and the candidates answer, with no time for unfettered exchanges.


McCain doesn't want to see a real "debate" and somehow I doubt that's what we will see tonight.

What resulted from negotiations between campaigns is a 90-minute format that calls for the two candidates to stand at podiums and field questions from a moderator. Answers may not exceed 90 seconds, and two minutes of open discussion will follow each question. Each candidate will give a 90-second closing statement.

My guess is the McCain campaign wanted to keep Palin's answer time to as little as possible so she can repeat phrases and not have to do much "debating" at all.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Hillary Clinton To Replace Joe Biden?

Before I even start you can go ahead and file this one under "rumor," but since the Los Angeles Times has wrote something about this I felt as if it was time to go ahead and write my own post regarding this popular rumor.

Have you heard? After the Joe Biden vs Sarah Palin debate this coming Thursday, rumor has it that Joe Biden will step aside and be replaced by none other than Hillary Clinton!

Hillary Clinton Joe Biden

Now, I am neither Democrat nor Republican, but I have to say this would be quite an exciting change in this election campaign. I think when you compare Hillary Clinton to Sarah Palin you can see a clear difference between the resumes, and this change in the game would be very interesting.

Why would Joe Biden back out of this important election? Again, this is a rumor, but it's being said that the reason is due to health problems.

I don't watch sports, so I watch politics, however I do not do so with the emotional burden many others do. As most, my team usually doesn't win, so I am stuck watching the other winning teams parade their most valuable players and I am on the sidelines like the rest of you. My libertarian views often pit me against not only Republicans, but Democrats, but I do see the need for change within this country and will do my part in helping assist that change.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Joe Biden vs Sarah Palin Debate Nears

Excitement would be an understatement to the feeling many have in anticipation of the Biden vs Palin debate, as it nears. With decades of experience we know Biden is most likely ready, but how ready is the newcomer from Alaska, Sarah Palin?

Joe Biden vs Sarah Palin

Recent quotes regarding Palin indicate even conservatives are concerned with her performance during interviews.

Palin's recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.

No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I've been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I've also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted.

Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there's not much content there.

If Palin were a man, we'd all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she's a woman -- and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket -- we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.


And those are from someone who supported Sarah Palin until now, and this is before the debate even occurs!

Here's more...

"Holding Sarah Palin to just three interviews and microscopically focusing on each interview I think has been a mistake, I think they'd be a lot wiser to let Sarah Palin be Sarah Palin. Let her talk to the media, let her talk to people." - Governor Mitt Romney, who many within the GOP saw as the smartest choice as vice president.


And another...

"McCain needs to liberate his running mate from the former Bush aides brought in to handle her -- aides who seem to have succeeded in importing to the Palin campaign the trademark defensive crouch of the Bush White House." - Bill Kristol in the New York Times


I agree that if Palin were a man, more people would be attacking her credibility and readiness to be commander in chief should that need arise. I don't think many Americans actually feel she would be ready to handle the reigns of the country, and McCain's choice of her as a running mate says volumes about his decision making in regards to this nation.

The first vice president debates are this Thursday, and no matter which side of the aisle you are voting for this should make for some good political entertainment. This is better than sports.

Democrats will cheer on Joe Biden and trumpet his three decades of political experience, and the Republicans and conservatives will sit there hoping it doesn't get too messy, and debate with themselves and their constituents how they let things get so bad. The country is ready for change, and most Americans are tired of the same old policies that have gotten us where we are today.

Labels: , , , , , ,